Skip to content
Digital assets

RWA-SURE

RWA-SURE addresses the seam that tokenization creates: the asset, the register and the legal claim that binds them. Protection is structured across all three, because a failure in any one of them produces the same result for the holder.
Overview
Tokenized asset protection
What it protects
The seam between a real asset, its register and the legal claim that binds them.
Written against
eWpG and ZuFinG, the German electronic securities and future financing regimes

Cover modules

  1. Issuance controls

    Structured around the authority to mint, burn and adjust supply, the point where token and asset can diverge.

  2. Underlying custody

    The real-world asset addressed on its own terms: where it sits, who holds it, how it is verified.

  3. Registry integrity

    Continuous reconciliation between on-chain representation and off-chain holdings of record.

  4. Settlement layer

    Exposure arising in transfer, delivery-versus-payment and cross-venue settlement.

  5. Legal linkage

    The enforceable claim examined as an insurable object, jurisdiction by jurisdiction.

Perils covered

  • Tokenization-layer failure: a contract, mint or burn, key or ledger fault that blocks settlement
  • Redemption and settlement failure, a valid request not settled within the defined service level
  • Selective counterparty failure: platform, transfer agent or custodian, on the shortfall after recovery
  • Failure of a contracted liquidity facility after valid collateral has been posted

Never covered

  • General market value loss on the underlying asset
  • Token price against net asset value
  • Cover that does not exist, or that was represented fraudulently
  • An invalid legal entitlement, the claim has to be real before it can be insured
  • Code defects predating audit sign-off, and flaws known before inception
  • Market-driven suspension where the issuer is not at fault

Conditions of inception

These are conditions of inception, not matters of claim. Where the evidence is not in place, cover does not attach.

Written against

  • eWpG and ZuFinG, the German electronic securities and future financing regimes
  • The BaFin DLT Pilot Regime, where the issuance sits inside it
  • MiCAR, where the instrument falls within its scope
  1. Entitlement mapping

    The legal claim traced from holder to asset, in writing, before anything is bound.

  2. Contract assurance

    Audited contracts with the sign-off dated, so the boundary of a pre-existing defect is not arguable.

  3. Register reconciliation

    Token supply reconciled against holdings of record on a defined cycle.

  4. Settlement service level

    A defined redemption and settlement window, the cover attaches to a stated obligation.

Built for

  • Tokenization platforms
  • Issuers of tokenized instruments
  • Transfer agents and administrators
  • Institutional holders of RWAs

Capacity, limits, wordings and commercial terms are not published. They are structured per counterparty and shared directly under engagement.

Products

The structureis built.The terms areset with you.