Skip to content
RWA · Settlement · Registry

The token is onlyas sound as thelink beneath it

Tokenization moves an asset onto a rail that settles in seconds. What it does not move is the legal claim, the custody of the underlying, or the integrity of the register that connects the two. 1B underwrites the seam between the asset and its representation.
Risk class
Tokenized Assets
Focus
RWA · Settlement · Registry
Related products
RWA-SURE · NOVA
Operating model
Verify → Monitor → Prevent → Recover → Insure
Asset / register reconciliationIDLE
SUPPLY · HOLDINGS OF RECORD · LEGAL LINKAGE
The gap

Why the traditional market struggles

Traditional cover addresses either the physical asset or the financial instrument. A tokenized asset is both, plus a third thing: a cryptographic representation whose validity depends on issuance controls, registry integrity and enforceable legal linkage. When the token and the underlying diverge, no conventional wording is written to answer the question of which one the policy follows.

Exposure surface

What we structurearound.

The risk surfaces that shape the programme. Cover is structured per counterparty, this is the map, not the wording.

Issuance and registry integrity

Unauthorised minting, register corruption and divergence between token supply and underlying holdings.

Custody of the underlying

Loss, damage or misappropriation of the real-world asset backing the token.

Legal linkage failure

Exposure where the enforceable claim to the asset does not survive transfer of the token.

Settlement and finality

Failed or contested settlement across chains, venues and delivery-versus-payment structures.

Valuation and oracle dependency

Mispricing, stale reference data and manipulation of the inputs that determine value.

Transfer agent and service provider

Errors, omissions and failures of the parties operating the tokenization stack.

How 1B operates here

The loop, appliedto this class.

The same five stages, calibrated to the specific evidence this risk class produces.
  1. Verify

    Independent review of issuance controls, registry design and the legal chain from token to asset.

  2. Monitor

    Continuous reconciliation signals between on-chain supply and off-chain holdings.

  3. Prevent

    Control requirements at the issuance boundary and at every point of supply change.

  4. Recover

    Response covering register correction, legal enforcement and holder communication.

  5. Insure

    Cover structured across the asset, the register and the parties operating between them.

Continuous signals

What stays under observation once the risk is bound.

  • On-chain / off-chain reconciliation
  • Issuance control topology
  • Underlying custody arrangement
  • Oracle and pricing dependency
  • Redemption and transfer mechanics
  • Jurisdiction of the legal claim
Built for
  • Tokenization platforms
  • Issuers of tokenized instruments
  • Fund administrators and transfer agents
  • Banks and settlement infrastructure
  • Family offices holding tokenized assets
Tokenized Assets

This risk isalready live.The insuranceshould be too.